This is one response from my post on Myspace.com

You my friend are retarded. why do i say your retarded you ask?

you think your attackign atheism when really your attacking nothing but yourself because Your arguing against yourself. you try and make a "valid" argument by using "logic" to "logically" explain why we must have "logic" because an eternal infinite being that thinks "logically" imparted it upon us? on that note, if an infinite beign thinks logically, and logic is relative, who is it realtive to if no one else was around? a narrow-minded individual as yourself thinks that it is imposibble to even argue against the existence of god without the rules of logic. tell me sir, what are the rules of logic ? and you can argue using your "rules of logic" that there is a god in existence just as i can argue that there isnt using my "rules of logic" you say that everythign is relative, which i note you say to be self-refuting, so why would you even base your argument on logic , if it is RELATIVE. thats the most unintelligent post i have ever seen. and furthermore, you use flawed reasoning to prove a point and you even go as low as citing an example that has no validity in your argument. let me put it this way. what was given to people when they first arrived on the planet??? according to your truths (bible) were they given the knowledge of computers, automobiles, cloning, televisions, radios, ?? i think not. <> and guess what people made, autmobiles and computers. your argument is so biased its blinding and lacking in any form of reason and intelligent thinking.

in short, please do not talk to anyone because the last thing we need is more dumbass zealot christians who think they know their talking about.

Why should I respond to this?

1. He somehow got the idea that I believe everything is relative, then in turn create a strawman out of it.

a. (you say that everythign is relative, which i note you say to be self-refuting, so why would you even base your argument on logic , if it is RELATIVE.)

b. (if an infinite beign thinks logically, and logic is relative, who is it realtive to if no one else was around?)

2. He used rhetoric?

a.(you try and make a "valid" argument by using "logic" to "logically" explain why we must have "logic" because an eternal infinite being that thinks "logically" imparted it upon us?)

3. He begged the question

a. (you think your attackign atheism when really your attacking nothing but yourself because Your arguing against yourself.)

b. (and you can argue using your "rules of logic" that there is a god in existence just as i can argue that there isnt using my "rules of logic") There are not different kinds of logic.

c. (thats the most unintelligent post i have ever seen. and furthermore, you use flawed reasoning to prove a point and you even go as low as citing an example that has no validity in your argument.)

4. He used the fallacy of Ad Hominem

a. (a narrow-minded individual as yourself thinks that it is imposibble to even argue against the existence of god without the rules of logic)

b. (in short, please do not talk to anyone because the last thing we need is more dumbass zealot christians who think they know their talking about)